7 DEC 2021 >> Criminal Offences: Homicide – Human Trafficking – Pedophilia – Extortion – Intimidation – Power of Attorney – Fraud – Misleading Justice – Interception of Communications – False Pretence – Forgery – False Documents

OFFENCES COMMITTED IN THIS CASE

CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE – https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-1.html

Homicide

222 (1) A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being.   https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-222.html

I added Homicide as the first Criminal Offence although it happened at the end of this case, you know . . . how it ended “they killed him” – If this is the first time you are on this site or if you have not read the trail of events – you might have difficulty to understand.  It means you would have to read the whole sequence of events to realize they committed premeditated homicide.  To help you, here are documents to check out:

The homicide premeditation point in time:  12-16 December 2018 – Mark Smith was terminated on 16 December 2018 – Although the family is involved including other parties, the GUERTIN clan are the primary killers as they used the MEDICAL environment to kill him off – throughout this case, they have demonstrated they do Medical crimes – their signature.

Part 10 – Why did they want to GRAB Mark Smith in the first place? Why did grab & kidnapping change to premeditated homicide after mid-September 2018?

List-sickness-to-death-updated.pdf <– start with the last page

CASE OVERVIEW – INDEX >> Parts 1-9 January-DECEMBER 2018

Photo taken December 1979 – the day Mark Smith was handed off to GUERTIN by FAMILY (mother, step-father).  “you are the father of this 25 year old woman child – go with your new family” <–  Father-Child cover.  It was/is not his child <– the child known as Anton GUERTIN was born 7 December 1979.  He knew by age 12-13, Mark Smith was not his real father (1992 Secure Power of Attorney) – He agreed at age 38-39 (2017-18) to perpetuate the illusion and use it to foster father-son trust bond to carry out with the GRAB operation (Power of Attorney renewal)  which became a premeditated homicide (12-16 DEC 2018).

The start point of his life enslavement started in Winter 1979 (13 years old).

1965 – Hospital INFANT Trafficking $10-15K – G-Grandfather STOPS It but Dies in 1978 puts Mark Back at Risk | 1978-79 – Old Man LAVERGNE (Future Estate) SELLS YOUTH to the GUERTIN Family

 

Human Trafficking “Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes” – S.C. 2000, c. 24

DEFINITION:  crime against humanity means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or omission that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission. (crime contre l’humanité)

150 – Sexual Offences

Pedophilia

• 150.1 (1) Subject to subsections (2) to (2.2), when an accused is charged with an offence under section 151 or 152 or subsection 153(1), 160(3) or 173(2) or is charged with an offence under section 271, 272 or 273 in respect of a complainant under the age of 16 years, it is not a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge.

• Marginal note:Exception — complainant aged 12 or 13

  (2) When an accused is charged with an offence under section 151 or 152, subsection 173(2) or section 271 in respect of a complainant who is 12 years of age or more but under the age of 14 years, it is a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge if the accused

  • (a) is less than two years older than the complainant; and

  • (b) is not in a position of trust or authority towards the complainant, is not a person with whom the complainant is in a relationship of dependency and is not in a relationship with the complainant that is exploitative of the complainant.

He was 13 years old >> sexually exploited as means to slap the father-son cover “organized with the FAMILY in  Feb/Mar 1979″ – Birth date is 12 Sep 1965.  The youth was tricked through seduction and then told he was the father of the unborn child of  25 year old Michelle Guertin which would be born in early December 1979.

In picture above, he is 14 (late December 1979 infant is born) –  the family was given an envelope garnished with a substantial amount of money  – the photo was taken after <– first hand information from Mark Smith who witnessed the transaction passed as a financial Christmas gift to Family (Jean-Paul and Theresa Lavergne).

151 Sexual Interference

152 Invitation to Sexual Touching

153 (1) Sexual Exploitation

153 (2) Inference of Sexual Exploitation

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Under Canada’s Criminal Code (R.S.C. 1985, c.C-46, last amended on
August 27, 2021)

Section 346 (1). Extortion
 Section 346 (1) states: ‘Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces or attempts to induce any person, whether or not he is the person threatened, accused or menaced or to whom violence is shown, to do anything or cause anything to be done.’

2. Intimidation:
Section 423 (1) states: Everyone is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do, or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from doing,

(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or their intimate partner or children, or injures the person’s property;

(b) intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of that person by threats that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other injury will be done to or punishment inflicted on him or her or a
relative of his or hers, or that the property of any of them will be damaged;

Section 264.1 (1) Uttering threats

Criminal code section 331: Theft by Power of Attorney – Abuse of Power

3 MARCH 2018 she openly threatened to have him forcefully removed “brandishing her POA”  –  Here’s one of many clips extracted from date-stamped full-length audio – Mark on telephone with Michelle GUERTIN >> 20180303A-1-3.46-ONCALL-GUERTIN-THREATS-using-POA for INSTITUTIONALIZATION.mp3 – this is one of several audios.

Criminal code section 380(1): Fraud

Misleading Justice – Fabricating evidence

Criminal Code section 137 Every one who, with intent to mislead, fabricates anything with intent that it shall be used as evidence in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, by any means other than perjury or incitement to perjury is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

(1) In February/March 2011, fabricating a false arrest warrant under name Mark Trepanier <– Michelle Guertin

(2) On 21 December 2011, Nicole Periard false police accusation toward Lyn Champagne (two witnesses).

Interception of Communications

Interception

• 184 (1) Every person who, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, knowingly intercepts a private communication is guilty of

  • (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or

  • (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

  • https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-26.html#h-118925

ILLEGAL MONITORING OF ALL COMMUNICATION POINTS including IN-HOUSE VOICE-OUTS in order to commit crime

False Pretences

• 361 (1) A false pretence is a representation of a matter of fact either present or past, made by words or otherwise, that is known by the person who makes it to be false and that is made with a fraudulent intent to induce the person to whom it is made to act on it.

• Marginal note:Exaggeration

  (2) Exaggerated commendation or depreciation of the quality of anything is not a false pretence unless it is carried to such an extent that it amounts to a fraudulent misrepresentation of fact.

Forgery and Offences Resembling Forgery

Forgery

• 366 (1) Every one commits forgery who makes a false document, knowing it to be false, with intent

Making false document

(2) Making a false document includes

• • (a) altering a genuine document in any material part;

  • (b) making a material addition to a genuine document or adding to it a false date, attestation, seal or other thing that is material; or

  • (c) making a material alteration in a genuine document by erasure, obliteration, removal or in any other way.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-50.html#h-122291

Criminal code section 462.31: Money Laundering ?

It begs the question what would you do with Power of Attorney behind someone’s back  – Where you need to recapture the target and incapacitate him (using MEDICAL confinement)  and renew the Power of Attorney under the target legal name change (2007) – The Power of Attorney signed in 1992-93 was under his baptismal name (Trepanier) – In 2007, he found his birth certificate and changed his name accordingly (Smith).  Why as Power of Attorney do you need to get a hold of the target?  could it be financial assets under that person’s name that were put in place by the Power of Attorney?  After all it is tied to the LAVERGNE ESTATE.

• Document currently being updated >> Chronological List of SICKNESS
• 01-Conflict Instigation >> 5-stage Life Cycle – Scripted Routine – Examination.pdf
• CASE OVERVIEW – INDEX  (Parts 1 to 9) >> January-December 2018
• Part 10 – Why did they want to GRAB Mark Smith in the first place? Why did grab & kidnapping change to PREMEDITATED HOMICIDE after mid-September 2018?

This was stricken out of the Canadian Criminal Code in 2018 . . . I strongly disagree, it should have been kept.  Read on.
>>> Pretending to practice Witchcraft <<<

2 March 2018 – Father-Son Bond Broken – Michelle Guertin >>powerful story of Witchcraft restores father-son trust | 2nd time >> 10 April 2018 Louis blamed her again using Witchcraft –

Also read the comment attached to this post.

While it has been recently reported by other non-Canadian media sources that “it is now legal to practice Witchcraft in Canada”, it is important to note that it is not illegal to be a Witch in this country. Section 365 of the Criminal Code of Canada clearly states that it is the element of pretending or fraud that is the problem:

Section 365 – Pretending to practice witchcraft, etc.

Every one who fraudulently

• (a) pretends to exercise or to use any kind of witchcraft, sorcery, enchantment or conjuration,
• (b) undertakes, for a consideration, to tell fortunes, or
• (c) pretends from his skill in or knowledge of an occult or crafty science to discover where or in  what manner anything that is supposed to have been stolen or lost may be found,

is guilty of an offense punishable on summary conviction.

Another important distinction to make is that the bill has not yet passed, but it has just been presented, and is “in committee” and being considered. The law will not be stricken from the books until it is passed by members of parliament.

Charges under section 365 of the criminal code are usually added to the more serious charges.

So in other words, pretending to practice Witchcraft is a means to an end such as in our case – as means to regain Father-Son Trust Bond.

Views: 81