Criminal code section 380(1): Fraud
Interception of Communications
Interception
-
184 (1) Every person who, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, knowingly intercepts a private communication is guilty of
-
(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or
-
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
- https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-26.html#h-118925
-
ILLEGAL MONITORING OF ALL COMMUNICATION POINTS including IN-HOUSE VOICE-OUTS in order to commit crime – Satellite “eye in the sky” pointing to our property – Estimated start point in time is 2016.
Primer #1 >> Electronic monitoring for Crime Operational Intel
Primer #3 >> Electronic Monitoring & Use of PSY-based Technology for Criminal Agenda
Electronic monitoring is the golden INTEL tool – it’s like knowing the lottery numbers – insider information to advance the crime agenda.
In October 2024, I started drafting a post to point out times when intercepted communications influenced their criminal agenda . . . When I detected the influence and change of course.
After listing the dates, I realized I couldn’t really do this post because it would end up being a 40 some page document.
Just to give you a sense, check it out – the dates are listed >> IN PROGRESS –> Points in Time when Intercepted Communications Influenced Criminal Agenda
Views: 53